Im+io Fachmagazin, Ausgabe 1/ 2022

Time to Rethink for a Cycle: Reallabor Digitized Circular Economy


[1] 100 days of possibility, URL:, Stand: 23.01.2022.

[2] United Nations University, zitiert nach: Erzeugung von Elektroschrott weltweit – Prognose bis 2030 | Statista, URL:, Stand: 23.01.2022.

[3] Kirchherr et al., Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions, Resources, Conservation and Recycling Volume 127, December 2017, Pages 221-232.

[4] Bmwi., Neue Räume, um Innovationen zu erproben – Konzept für ein Reallabor-Gesetz, URL:, Stand 03.02.2022.

[5] H. Kaebernick et al., Sustainable product development and manufacturing by considering environmental requirements, Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing Volume 19, December 2003, Pages 461-468.

[6] S. Lawrenz et al., Is it all about Information? The Role of the Information Gap between Stakeholders in the Context of the Circular Economy, Procedia CIRP Volume 98, Pages 364-369.

[7] F. Zuloaga et al., Cool products don´t cost the earth (Full report), September 2019, URL:, Stand: 03.02.2022.

[8] S. Svensson-Hoglund et al., Barriers, enablers and market governance: A review of the policy landscape for repair pf consumer electronics in the EU and the U.S., Journal of Cleaner Production, March 2021.

[9] N. Nasr und M. Thurston, Remanufacturing: A Key Enabler to Sustainable Product Systems, Proceedings of LCE, January 2006.

[10] J. Kirchherr et al., Barriers of the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU), Ecological Economics Vol. 150, August 2018.

[11] VDI ZRE Publikationen: Kurzanalyse Nr. 18, Ressourceneffizienz durch Remanufacturing – Industrielle Aufarbeitung von Altteilen, URL:, Stand: 02.02.2022.

[12] Frauenhofer ISI: The promise and limits of Urban Mining, URL:, Stand: 01.02.2022.


[1a] Circular Economy Modellkreis, URL:, Stand: 03.02.2022.